Court: Documents in T. Deny Sanford case must be unsealed

The South Dakota Supreme Court docket dominated Thursday that affidavits from an investigation into youngster pornography allegations in opposition to billionaire philanthropist T. Denny Sanford have to be unsealed.

In 2019, South Dakota investigators searched his electronic mail account, in addition to his mobile and web service suppliers, for proof of possession of kid pornography, after his accounts had been flagged by a know-how agency.

Sanford, the state’s richest man, was not charged after the South Dakota legal professional basic’s workplace mentioned its investigation into the allegations discovered no prosecutable offenses throughout the state’s jurisdiction.

Sanford had sought to bar affidavits used to subject search warrants within the case. However the Sioux Falls Argus Chief and ProPublica argued in court docket that the paperwork needs to be made public.

After the choice to not file expenses, Choose James Energy ordered in June 2022 that South Dakota regulation required the affidavits to be unsealed. They had been saved sealed whereas Sanford’s attorneys appealed, sending the case to the state Supreme Court docket.

Sanford argued that releasing the paperwork might have an effect on his privateness and status.

Initially, the court docket paperwork referred solely to “an implicated particular person,” main the Argus Chief and ProPublica to go to court docket looking for entry to the information.

The search warrants had been unsealed in 2021, figuring out Sanford by identify for the primary time, however the affidavits remained sealed.

In Thursday’s unanimous resolution, the state Supreme Court docket’s discovered the decrease court docket had totally thought-about all authorized and constitutional floor asserted by Sanford.

“The court docket’s method to redaction fell soundly inside its discretion, and the court docket appropriately exercised its discretion to “resolve whether or not there (had been) ample grounds to ban entry” to the affidavits.

Sanford has donated billions to hospitals, universities and charities, and the Sanford Well being system is known as for him. He made his fortune because the founding father of First Premier Financial institution in South Dakota, which is thought for issuing high-interest bank cards to these with poor credit score.

His legal professional, Stacey Hegge, argued that Sanford ought to be capable to examine and take part in redacting the affidavits earlier than the circuit court docket unseals them, to keep away from any disclosure of commerce secrets and techniques.

Hegge declined to remark Thursday on the ruling and wouldn’t say if an enchantment was deliberate.

Shelly Conlon, the Argus Chief’s information director, applauded the court docket’s resolution.

“To tackle a Goliath of an affect in our neighborhood and win at present is a robust victory for the general public’s proper to know,” Conlon mentioned. “The regulation is obvious, and the Court docket’s resolution solely reaffirms the position journalism has in accountability and understanding authorities, public determine and regulation enforcement selections.”

Jon Arneson, legal professional for the Argus Chief, famous that the ruling got here simply two weeks after attorneys argued the case earlier than the state Supreme Court docket.

“Clearly, I agree with the Supreme Court docket’s unanimous resolution,” he mentioned. “The reasoning was sound and nicely articulated.”

The court docket’s ruling additionally famous that attorneys for the state had argued that unsealing an affidavit after the investigation was over was in keeping with society’s pursuits in having regulation enforcement and the judiciary function in public, even when no expenses are filed.

Back To Top