O'Keefe Charged in Minnesota Vote Probe
Prosecutors filed felony counts against activists who used false names during the state's primary vouching process.
By Renata Mehta ·

James O'Keefe and Cam Higby face felony charges in Hennepin County for allegedly using false identities at Minnesota polling places during the August 11 primary. The charges, announced by County Attorney Mary Moriarty, include unlawful voting and identity theft. Both men recorded their interactions with poll workers, a method O'Keefe has used previously to test election procedures.
The legal theory behind the case relies on the specific mechanics of Minnesota's vouching system. This provision allows a registered voter to vouch for another person who lacks current proof of address, enabling the second person to register and vote in that precinct on the same day. Moriarty stated that O'Keefe and Higby initiated this process using the names of registered voters in the precinct without the actual voters' knowledge or permission. They stopped short of signing the final oath, but the prosecutor argued that beginning the procedure with false names was sufficient to trigger felony counts.
Moriarty described the incident as a test of the state's ability to detect irregularities. She noted that poll workers noticed what they characterized as strange behavior and reported it to election officials. Those officials then requested a police investigation. The County Attorney said the response demonstrated that the system for identifying misconduct functioned as intended during the primary election.
The video of the incident was posted to YouTube on August 13. In the footage, O'Keefe and Higby wear costumes resembling attire worn by some Muslims and use fake accents. Higby keeps his face covered, and O'Keefe refers to him as his wife. They approached multiple voting sites in Minneapolis to ask how the vouching process worked. O'Keefe Media Group, the organization O'Keefe founded, released a statement explaining that the men created an intentionally extreme scenario to expose vulnerabilities in the state's rules. The group said the team wanted to see how workers would respond and what safeguards they would describe.
The vouching process is rarely used in Minnesota. According to the Secretary of State’s office, fewer than 0.6% of votes cast in the November 2024 election used this method. It is most common among older adults who do not drive and have not updated their address on a driver's license. To use the process, the person being vouched for must provide a Minnesota driver's license number, an ID card number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number.
O'Keefe, 42, of West Palm Beach, Florida, and Higby, 26, of Covington, Washington, have not yet entered a plea. Neither had an attorney listed in court records at the time of the announcement. O'Keefe was not immediately available for comment, and Higby did not respond to an email request for comment.
David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, noted that he is not aware of vouching leading to organized or widespread fraud in the past. He observed, however, that there have been recent efforts by advocates of voter fraud claims to commit questionable acts themselves. Becker emphasized that impersonating another voter is a serious crime regardless of the specific state law involved.
Voter identification requirements vary across the United States. Thirty-six states require some form of identification at the polls, ranging from photo IDs to utility bills. In the remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., voters can cast ballots without showing ID by verifying their identity through other means. These methods include signing an affidavit or providing personal information such as a birth date or address. Some states, including Minnesota, allow other registered voters to vouch for those without current ID, while others like Alaska and New Hampshire permit election officials who know the voter personally to verify their identity.
Source: KSAT-TV





